Science designs mind
How
can humans use science to reframe the successes of religion to design a whole
book of maps of mind that includes Cultural coherence? How does the certainty of
the scientific method allow reliable stable maps that are expected to
change/evolve to “New and Better”? Can putting religion into the language of
science show how the intuitive mind of religion prefigured modern science of
complexity?
The sacred is transformed into complete fit as a new way of seeing from all viewpoints. Science becomes the next step of what was seen as “spiritual”. The dualism of spiritual / material is integrated and synergized into complete access to knowledge and wisdom and material wealth. Fate is transcended by open opportunity to any profession or class.
Since nothing is sacred, if some
design does not function or is not complete, new ways and designs can be tried!
Overcoming reductionism
Problems
of science and religion defined. The political and social organization of
religions which asserts that perfection is beyond the ability of all but the one
perfect hero, or some supernatural being, emerges from the confusion of the
activity of the brain. Lateral all in one layer organization must use winner
take all inhibitory activity for operant behaviour to take place. In simple
language, this means that any organism can only perform one action, even if this
is very complex and has many facets, at a time. We call more that one action
confusion or uncoordinated - incongruous behaviour. An example is a person who
helps with an angry or bored or inattentive attitude. We know that they are not
unified in their intent. In life -death situations, indecision or unresolved
competing brain models of action may be fatal, thus species that could not come
to some immediate action would not survive. When this way of processing
information spills over to or is confused with bi-directional resonance
processes between layers, the importance of certain models and layers are
exaggerated to become rules and heroes and over important as Gods. They must be
obeyed without thought. This is the evolution of the human species: a
application of horizontal processes to "vertical" time binding cycles
and to the inhibition of the "animal" relationship to our ecological
nitch. We internalize this relationship as knowledge - rules data that can be
manipulated and objectified as language! Thus the exaggerations that make Jesus
into the perfect man God that can only happen once in all of human history, or
that makes the Buddhist enlightenment attainable only after death as some
Buddhists now believe, emerge from this winner take all functionality of the
inhibitory neocortex. Altered states of consciousness and Buddhist enlightenment
also arises due to this functioning when applied even to the winner. What
emerges is a clean slate, free of all cultural incomberments and concepts, and
what "shines thru" is the self organizing / self regulating mind
evolved over hundreds of millions of years using the enormous resources of
life's genetic code that links all life forms.
Completeability: It a “energy” of holomind as well as of matter. In science it is defined as the requirement of any new idea or theory to be completeable within the context of all known “Laws” and truth. Any point or location of a hologram and of holomind has the complete information of the context of the object of the hologram. All electron shells connect with other elements until the shells are complete. This is a “power” or dimension of Reality. So is self organization part of this inner need of reality for completion. Coherence is a “in step” or “lining up” that results in completion because there is no contradiction and cancellation. The Tia Chi unity is a completion of Yin and Yang. The phase spaces result in a new level of completion by the next level of holomind. So the phase as detail or as a piece of a puzzle looks for completion at the next level?
Materialist position regarding self and consciousness is that we are the sum of our information. My position is that we are information generators and if we are found in other conditions we would produce different information.
I see consciousness as "Seeing" within the neocortex as if it was a landscape of language and in the 3rd dimension of where and how the language is plugged into our older brain.
Global
position of "rational" science and "rational consciousness": "Science" does not have actual
openness to new ideas because of fragmentation and the bias toward
"rational" knowledge. There is an assumption that
"consciousness" is rational and therefore so are the objects of
consciousness. This goes to the universe as a whole as an object that can be
studied. It exists. There is no "subject" that made it, no
"god" that created it. In one model, associated with the "Big
Bang" theory, the universe was created - started at one "moment"
of time along with all the "laws of physics". This happened because of
an instability in a region of space inconceivably small. At this small size a
poppy seed would contain billions AND billions of atomic nuclei each of which
contained billions OF billions of
universes. [at least 10 followed by 20 zeros] All of this incredible and
incomprehensible "mathematical truth" obscures the assertion that
there was no creativity connected to this event, just another accident and
instability "caused" by chance. This rules out creativity as having
any place in this universe until another accident happens along. This anti myth,
in which there are no gods or intelligent actions on a global scale, appears to
have the same structure as the "western" and especially Christian myth
of creation: "IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED..." [It is ironic that the
"correct" translation of the Hebrew is "AT THE BEGINNING..."
which implies a involvement of creativity in the here-and-now.] My global
position is that the "universe" is the output - surface of creative
"programs" which are mistaken for "laws" only because very
few "subjects" at certain moments change the "source code"
or the program, and if or when this is done, rational consciousness dismisses it
as illusion or anomaly. If creativity exists, then anomaly is not an
"exception", and "everything" is a
"one-time-event". "Everything" is the object surface of the
"universe" and the "true" stability are the
"programs" and their creative sources which can connect "cycles
of time and space" into new programs.
In
the lower dimension there are fewer phase states available Thus rational mind
organizes the work in a way which loses an entire dimension. The soul and spirit
and mind are all meta levels of orientation! The pendulum pattern reveals itself
over millions of years. This is because the drift of the separate locations
takes that long to make complete rotations to the same spot. The lack of
synchronous dimensions in culture results in uncoordinated duplication, with
each subset trying to expand to the next "line" or dimension slice.
Thus,
rational mind tries to prove that other dimensions do not exist, as in the
present situation in western schools Thus "equality" becomes a
disorganization factor which inhibits 'mind" from higher dimensional
organization: everything must be set in an equal frame, reduced to a lower
dimensional frame.
All
single dimensions are coordinated by this meta structure All
"forgotten" or ignored dimensions are lost. Thus the loss of awareness
of the constellations looses a dimension. The alignment with a subsystem also
creates a situation such as the scrambling of a pay for view TV cable channel by
not transmitting the vertical alignment code, which results in a chaotic jumbled
picture where certain portions of the picture are visible. This can result in
"rational" mind trying to find the alignment in fewer dimensions.
Feelings
are dimensional syncs., which orient humans or signal that an event is violating
[anger] or have perfect alignment.
5. N.nets between layers are adaptive resonant: [constructive / destructive resonance] adaptive resonance and tradition. Energy surfaces and minima. Solution states and heating / shaking by size of shake by levels of resolution and planets! Never ending looking for solutions.
Evolution of Neural nets: if we must build a n.net for each problem, then heads may be as large as houses, but if we build virtual neural nets out of holograms then we can stack n.nets like programs on a disk drive and load / access them any time and for any circumstance! Thus representational systems and nets representations use phase space as neural nets! So the holograms are not stored memory, but stored cognition and context!
Thus the biological neural nets are like 486s that are who
is talking when we refer to "I" did this and the "I" is an
image holographic representation which is also a virtual neural network with
full cognitive abilities. I may be that such idiot savants that can do enormous
calculations but nothing else do not have the ability to load virtual images and
are using their lower brain or neocortex only as a single cognizer! Thus the
biological system that loads a virtual brain is like the RISC chips that load
the contents of other chips! Thus we are like other animals in the zodiac in a
real way and have a wide variety of types! Thus the spiritual traditions talked
about an absolute self, unchangeable which are these biological nets. The key is
we trade speed for computing power and flexibility! RISC uses extreme speed and
we use extreme brightness in a small area which is actually slower because it
must penetrate deeper. Thus in meditation we relax to the "older"
basic operating system / hardware!!
>Mechanical
oscillators remember disturbances, and life chemical oscillators - clocks return
to homeostasis as self regulating dissipative systems.
>Humans
need the "memory" of mechanical oscillators for use as associators,
and also need the ability to ignore and "forget" as do dissipative
life systems. Thus ignorance again is primary for separation and individuation.
If the heart system could not ignore disturbances it would go into fibrillation
which is a loss of coordination of the sequence of actions of a complete
"Action" of the heart. Again this is in the phase space.
The
pendulum of the planet pattern : To create more than one dimension, the
pendulums must be aligned. This is the function of the single consciousness. The
single tropical zodiac lines up the various sub functions into a single
awareness _ alignment into a single coordinate synchronization of all
computations. Thus there will be a meta organization.
Solutions
Earth
may be "shadow" or other half rebellion of Eve's apple. Thus the use
of the heliocentric and the development of language comes from symmetry
operations of projection and is the ability / skill to construct procedures
independent of the cosmos as represented by the symbol "God". Eve as a
symbol takes on an "as-if" life of its own, since the n.nets that this
symbol points to evolves and self organizes. Because of the "split",
the persona is not in contact with the self on the other side of the boundary of
the division of labor [between man and woman]. This division into "the
two" was continued as a fractal scaled mapping. The "two" is a
one dimensional cognitive process as explained elsewhere.
From every-day experience we know what happens if we open a water tap. At first, the water jet is smooth, perfectly round and transparent; the physicist calls this laminar flow. But if we open the tap further and thereby increase the water pressure, this image changes abruptly at a certain point. The water jet forms strands and presents itself in a dynamic structure which somehow conveys the impression of being "muscular". This is the typical appearance of turbulent flow which remains unchanged for a while and, if the tap is opened even wider, changes over abruptly to other, similar structures. The beautiful regularity of the laminar jet, which almost seemed to stand still, is destroyed and disorder seems to rule.
But appearances betray truth. It is precisely in turbulent flow that a higher degree of order rules. Whereas in laminar flow the movement of the individual water molecules follow a random statistical law, turbulent flow groups them together in powerful streams which, in their overall effect, permit an increase of throughflow.
/ Here the chart of the 5 or 7 planets is a random flow, but when family structure of Jupiter/Sat enters the picture, there is an attempt or path / flow in the direction of maintaining the family structure and stability. Then Jupiter is the increase of disorder and adventure and dynamic growth, and Saturn is the neg. feedback to decrease disorder and bring things back to order and equilibrium.
The frequently cited "limits to growth" are overcome by the evolution of the dynamic structure; they reappear as the widened limits of a new structure. In nature, processes often have more than one structure available for their unfolding. In our example, the increase in water pressure and throughflow leads to the instability of the laminar flow structure and the appearance of a turbulent structure, which in turn evolves through a sequence of turbulent structures. What we are calling here structure is nothing solid, composed of the same components, but a dynamic regime which puts ever new water molecules through the same strands. It is a process structure.
pg. 21
Another example from the field of hydrodynamics demonstrates the spontaneous appearance of macroscopic order perhaps even more impressively. If we heat a big, shallow pan--bigger than usually found in kitchens--uniformly from below, regular hexagonal cells, the so-called Benard cells, appear. At first, the temperature in the layer of liquid is practically uniform, or in other words, the system is in its thermodynamic equilibrium. In this state, the heat from the bottom of the pan spreads through heat conduction, a mechanism in which the molecules get into thermal vibrations and transfer a part of this thermal energy in collisions with their neighbour molecules without moving from their place. But if the bottom of the pan becomes hotter and the temperature gradient in the liquid layer steeper, thermal non-equilibrium increases. At a certain gradient, convection starts, or in other words, heat transfer by movement of molecules. At first, smaller convection streams are suppressed by the environment. Beyond a critical temperature gradient, however, the fluctuations become reinforced rather than suppressed and the dynamic regime abruptly switches from conduction to convection. Macroscopic molecular streams form which include more than 10^20 molecules--a degree of order which cannot be explained by the familiar thermodynamic principles. A new macroscopic order emerges which may also be understood as a macroscopic fluctuation, stabilized by energy exchange with the environment. This order becomes manifest in the Benard cells (Fig. 1). From the perspective of the molecules, this phenomenon of structuration corresponds to a higher level of co-operation. As will be discussed later, the high nonequilibrium is of decisive importance here.
Macroscopic order plays an important and even dominant role in our everyday experience. This even holds for the realm of the inanimate. From water vortices and sand dunes all the way to stars and galaxies we recognize structures expressing macroscopic order principles. The rich world of forms has always exerted a certain aesthetic lure which sometimes has led to deeper thought and systematic exploration. In particular, the photographic studies of the Swiss physician Hans Jenny, who died in 1973, and known under the term "cymatics" (Jenny, 1967 and 1972) have become the precursor of empirical research interested in macroscopic order. More recently, Ralph Abraham (1976) is continuing these studies with his "macroscope" built at the University of California at Santa Cruz. In the macroscope, a varying energy throughput is produced in a viscous layer of a liquid by means of acoustical vibrations. A process structure appears which evolves with higher frequency through a sequence of instabilities and new structures.
However, physics has so far restricted itself to the study of a few specific phenomena only, which may be surprising in view of the wide open area of interesting research. General theoretical approaches developed in the 1940s and triggered by interest in biological phenomena, resulted in the broad frameworks of General System Theory (Bertalanffy, 1968) and cybernetics (by Norbert Wiener and others). Both approaches succeeded in acquiring a good understanding of the stabilization of given structures which becomes very fruitful in the domain of technology. But the original vision of achieving an understanding of macroscopic order across the boundaries between the animate and the inanimate world remained vague and inconclusive.
For biology and the social sciences, the macroscopic dynamics of coherent systems--systems whose structure does not remain rigid, but evolves in a coherent way--became ever more important and urgent. Organisms of all kinds and ecosystems are coherent systems, as are also cities, communities and the institutions of societies.
But the consideration of macroscopic dynamics ran into the resistance of the ruling reductionism of Western science whose aim it is to reduce all phenomena to one level of explanation--a level which physics hopes to find in the microscopic, in the basic structure of matter. It is not without irony that the Heisenberg indeterminacy relation-the recognition that it is impossible to observe simultaneously with high precision position as well as velocity of a particle--has first been formulated at the subatomic, microscopic level. In physics, it is of importance there because the impact of the observer on the observed phenomenon can no longer be neglected. For such an observation in the microscopic domain, the comparison has been made with the watch-maker who tries to repair a delicate wrist watch with a huge, heavy hammer.
But in the domain of life and to an even higher degree in the domains of social and psychological relations, the inclusion of the observer is even much more evident. With every action, every thought--and also with every observation and theory--we interfere with the object of our study. It appears as strange, therefore, that many physicists today search for the interface between the physical and the psychic, and even for the free will, exclusively in the microscopic realm of quantum mechanics. The complementarity between the concepts of the independent movement of individual particles and the holistic behaviour of the entire system of the atomic nucleus, as first formulated by Niels Bohr, has always been evident in the macroscopic realms of biological and social relationships. But to really see it, a new basic attitude was needed toward the phenomena which matter to us in our life.
/This is rulership by a new
organizing path / flow of Uranus as a new level of resolution. The view behind /
beyond normal experience for causes which would seem to organize the seemingly
random process of fate and karma of the chart. The idea is that disorder enters
when the flow is less powerful and order is maintained under
"pressure" or farther from equilibrium: Just as with mars as
"close" and personal to the normal situation as irritation and Saturn
as a more powerful flow which creates order further out".
The traditional reductionism of Western physics is not only based on a belief in the "simplicity of the microscopic" (as Prigogine puts it), but also on a static view which is primarily interested in spatial structure. A rigid structure may be easily disassembled into its pieces and reassembled again. In many cases, such a structure may be understood in terms of combinations of a few basic elements. Macroscopic properties, such as weight, stability, or strength, may be explained by the properties of components and their configuration.
/This is Uranus!! Take it apart into pieces and fragments.
In a true system, however, not all macroscopic properties follow from the properties of components and their combinations. Macroscopic properties often do not result from static structures, but from dynamic interactions playing both within the system and between the system and its environment. An organism is not defined by the sum of the properties of its cells. In chemical reaction systems, certain molecules which do not participate in the reaction may act as catalysts and thereby influence the overall dynamic system in a decisive way. A human being falling in love--perhaps only once in a lifetime--changes the life of the community of which he or she is part. Such considerations already hint at the fact that a systemic view of necessity leads to a dynamic perspective. Quite generally, a system becomes observable and definable as a system through its interactions. The hydrodynamic structures used as an example at the beginning of this chapter do not even consist of durable components, but are essentially process structures.
Three levels of inquiry in physics
Such a systematic and dynamic view helps to overcome the ruling reductionism in physics (not to speak of the domain of the living). Following a suggestion by Ilya Prigogine, we have to distinguish in physics at least between three levels of inquiry and description which are irreducible to each other.
Classical or Newtonian dynamics, the development of which is linked to names such as Laplace and Hamilton, makes statements in terms of mechanics, such as position or velocity of particles. It reduces the world to trajectories, or space-time lines, of single material points. The movement of a particle from point A to point B is perfectly reversible.
/Physics as a continuation of politics and training by supervision without self organization.
The impulse for the movement has to be provided from outside; there is no self-organization. The particles crossing the world on their lonely tracks, do not interact with each other. Thus, classical dynamics becomes the idealized case of "pure" motion of a particle or a wave packet, a mere thought model which nevertheless is useful for many considerations. But the "dirty" reality includes encounters, collisions, exchanges, mutual stimulation, challenges and coercions of many kinds. The collective with all its complexity can hardly be denied anywhere.
With the development of thermodynamics in the nineteenth century, a macroscopic view was introduced which considers whole populations of particles. Thermodynamics makes statements in terms such as temperature and pressure which represent the average effects of movements of a large number of molecules. This level of description addresses processes, or in other words, the order of change in the macroscopic values. The order of the processes themselves, or the evolution of the systems characterized by them, found its first valid formulation around 1850 in the well-known second law of thermodynamics (Clausius, basing on Carnot): The so-called entropy of an isolated system can only increase until the system has reached its thermodynamic equilibrium. It may suffice here to introduce the complex term entropy as a measure for that part of the total energy which is not freely available and cannot be used in the form of directed energy flow or work.*
In other words, entropy is a measure for the quality of the energy in the system. In contrast to the mechanical description, irreversibility or the directedness of processes is introduced as characteristic of this new level of description. Any future macroscopic state of the isolated system can only have equal or higher entropy, any past state only equal or lower entropy. The reverse is impossible. All irreversible processes produce entropy. More than a century ago, Ludwig Boltzmann interpreted the increase in entropy as increasing disorganization, as evolution toward the "most probable" state of maximum disorder. If the world had appeared as a stationary machine in the mechanical view, it now seemed to be doomed to the "heat death", a notion which influenced profoundly the pessimistic philosophy and art of the turn of the century up to our days.
/This is Yin.
Classical thermodynamics deals with equilibrium systems or systems near equilibrium. An isolated system without environment shows a particular type of self-organization (or, to be precise, self-disorganization). It will evolve in the direction of its equilibrium state and remain there. The more general and realistic case is a partially open system which exhibits similar behaviour. This is generally the case for systems not far from equilibrium. For all such systems, the Boltzmann ordering principle holds which stipulates irreversible evolution toward equilibrium.
With irreversibility, the notions of process and history enter. Time is given a direction from the past into the future. The system evolves through a sequence of thermodynamic states which may be ordered along the scale of a single macroscopic parameter, entropy. In a microscopic view, the system gains the experience of innumerable encounters and exchanges between system components (molecules), but in a macroscopic view all that changes is the relation between free energy and entropy in the total system. Although the time scale is not given in an absolute way, but depends on the internal system processes, the path and the goal of the macroscopic system evolution are unambiguously predetermined. Within the experience of a system of this kind, the equilibrium state determines the origin of the system as well as its death.
? It constitutes the only point
of self-reference of the system.
In thermodynamics, irreversibility often leads to the destruction of structures. But this does not hold in an absolute sense. At low temperatures, and if binding forces act at the same time, the approach to the equilibrium state may also give rise to structures. Crystals, snow flakes and biological membranes are such equilibrium structures with higher entropy than their corresponding liquid state from which they emerged. The emergence of form at increasing entropy also plays a role in condensation models of the universe (as will be discussed in Chapter 5). But there is also another way in which new structures may form, a way which is of central interest in this book. This is the spontaneous formation of structures in open systems which exchange energy and matter with their environment. Such systems constitute the other basic class of physical systems, namely, non-equilibrium systems of a particular kind.
With such considerations, a third level of inquiry and description is opened up, which may be called the level of coherent, evolving systems or (to anticipate what will be explained in a moment) the level of dissipative structures. Open systems have the possibility of continuously importing free energy from the environment and to export entropy. This means that entropy, in contrast to isolated systems, does not have to accumulate in the system and increase there. Entropy can also remain at the same level or even decrease in the system. The "accounting" includes the environment. The second law of thermodynamics becomes extended for open systems and the entropy change dS in a specific time interval is split into an internal component diS (entropy production due to irreversible processes within the system) and an external component deS (entropy flow due to exchange with the environment): dS = deS+diS, where the internal component diS can only be positive or zero (as in the case of the isolated system), but never negative (diS >- 0). The external entropy flow deS, in contrast, can be both positive and negative. Therefore, the total entropy may also decrease, or be stationary (dS -- 0). In the latter case, we have dis = -deS_>- 0. The internal production of entropy and the entropy export to the environment are in balance. Since, for the equilibrium state, both components would approach zero, it already becomes clear that an open state of order may be maintained only in a state of nonequilibrium. There has to be exchange with the environment and the system renews itself continuously. Being and becoming fall together at this level.
Dissipative structures constitute
the simplest case of spontaneous self-organization in open evolution. They will
be discussed in much detail below. However, it is important to recognize that
even without the phenomena of life, the description of a dynamic reality
requires at least three levels of inquiry. The reduction to one level, the
ancient dream of physics, is no longer possible.
And
few scientists, let alone nonscientists, had the diverse background to comment
on by ideas. I feel that a full presentation of my ideas is best frames a
"scientific metaphors", much like fairy tales in intent: as mythic
prescientific language. Humans are
totally individually unique, yet have no real individual personality or self as
repersented by the "I" in the types of statements: "I did it (to,
for, with, by) myself." This "I" or persona is a part of an
energy surface with minima which results from a cultural or group connectivity
as discribed in neural net theories. Humans are trained to their Astrological
signs which are abstract concepts reperesenting these minima or solutions.
Humans and all life start out connected to the
"real" heliocentric positions and structures of our solar
system and galaxie. The apparent or illusary positions given by the fact that we
are physically on the spaceship earth (called geocentric) also are used in the
cultural neural nets, but are evolutional receint additions. Humans at birth
have a heliocentric "chart" as a best representation of this original
Self and at the toddler stage are trained or supervised in completing their
cultural, language neural net brain structures. In this metaphor the
"weights" of the neural nets are provided by the positions of the
"planets" as they change in relation to the viewpoints of all others
earths' position that are different for each significant person: mom, dad,
siblings, peers, friends, significant others and "I". The task of
spiritual development is to individuate - differentiate the Self from this
cultural ego mass which is not me, but belongs to centuries and generations of
habit energy and unfinished gestalts, wishes: such as everyone being loving, yet
my culture - family - city is "best" or the dream of life lived "intellegently"
or freedom etc. This is not a process of causation, but of discovery. There are
many psychic structures associated with personality and Self Mind and each has
different "chart" structures. These have not been available or
explored in detail in the past. Only the cultural "I" is rooted in
what is called Astrology. The male - female, mind - feeling, competitive -
bonding dicatomies all relate to different structures. I can not, and do not
want to tell you the meaning of these structures, but wish to participate in the
discovery of the lfe and meaning you have embodied: I wish to share with you
what I am developing regarding the process function structure of consciousness.
I wish to awaken from the cultural trance produced by the power of suggestion
related to nomilizations assigned to planets and the Zodiac: there are real
mapping indexing information functions and bioenergetic cycles to be discovered
- uncovered in all of this.
Autonomous / Fragmented functioning of consciousness. Time tables &
or circadian / daily repetition cyclic activities are well known.
Consciousness maps that drive many of these tasks are hard wired as genetic
coding, yet there remains the interface between these intrapersonal actives of
the "body" and interpersonal impact of these activities as needs /
wants upon the environment. This interpersonal consciousness mapped as skills /
abilities has a structure detailed by acupuncture as QI flowing thru meridians.
The impact of the positions of the elements of the solar system (planets, orbits
etc.) upon the map of these meridians in a daily cycle reveal elemental
functions of consciousness similar to electronic circuits. RESISTANCE: as strong
activity. Capacitance as weak delayed activity. Transistors as aspects (angles)
between planets. OTHZERS These functions have a autonomous programmed effect.
Activities or needs that are met produce an expectation of being met / repeated
at the same time / place in all succeeding cycles. Thus one has an inner stimuli
(various types allowed) indexing the established activity one day later, one
month later, one year later, two years later, twelve years, thirty years!!!!!!!!
Changing program?? expand There are
the equivalent of many circuits in consciousness. All these circuits are active,
But are they all connected / integrated. OR how do interconnections affect
each other? Dampening? acceleration, slowing, shifting symbiotic? (where
one function tries to do work of another OTHER KINDS DETAIKED) Thus produced
"levels of abilities" Fragmented consciousness. Individuals better
suited (sorted) (matched) with all tasks preformed by humans. VAla cultures are
generated!!!
N.nets: Data in, rules out!!
The further self discovery lays in the understanding of why rules and laws are the most successful way to construct families and cultures because they are based on the need of holographic mind to create sources of coherence for mind and consciousness to function.
About 6: Holomind is structure of shared maps and of brain and diversity. Maps of and the search for coherence as new discipline minds.
Rules and Laws map the search for coherence in inventing new minds.
Mind, not truth! Thus religion will ignore truth or a search to develop more intense and stable coherence.
Coherent sources, even oppositional/emptiness are like autistic obsessive compulsive persons whose older brains are connected to “order”. This shows how fuzzy we allow our world to become, and that fuzziness is a sign of strong n.net development. Holographic code is also fuzzy. Letters in words are out of place and that is their “meaning”! So are musical thoughts. [which shows how compulsive performers can be]
Cellular Automata: each cell is a holographic piece with different phase space given by the planetary rule. Thus each neural net layer can be a different size phase space given by the planets. Thus the scanning procedure given by the planets is also giving the OR [mars] and AND [Venus] with other operators by other planets. That each cell is a full phase space in a hologram is new! These are logical structures. Thus the outer planets operate with fewer or smaller phase space but link up with more layers. Thus there may be 360 layers?! Then the earth reads a different cell on a different layer? Or are the signs different layers? Or what are the layers: maybe the nodes or the dyads? Thus our consciousness is a “longer” coherence that is a composite of many holocells just as we hear the sound centered in stereo, but this is multidimensional. Like dyads make it in 2 dims. And humans use 3 dims. Plus? Thus music is like visiting separate cells for each note/beat/measure?
Completeability: I expect in creating a model of the
structure of mind and consciousness that ALL the [so called] subjective
experiences of human
thought, and past metaphysics, religion and philosophy from all cultures are
completeable / explainable within my model. [and more]
Falsifiability and complementarity: I expect to present this model to the
public domain to that all humans can understand it and offer supportive or
oppositional ideas. This is looking at any model from all perspectives which
is a characteristic of holographic mind.
[holomind].
The scientific map of the universe, where the galaxy is 100,000 light years across, is really a map of the space / room in the multidimensional neocortex!
The harmony of singing or playing in the same key is a perfect illustration of shared maps necessary for culture! Holy Spirit!
This selection process is modeled at all levels of consciousness. The next stack / level is aware of the interactions: thus this selection process is a map of will and free will when the selection state is a fuzzy state. Stable states as in matter have only a single selection, and fuzzy states have many that complete that state?
I see consciousness as "Seeing" within the neocortex as if it was a landscape of language and in the 3rd dimension of where and how the language is plugged into our older brain.
Do with the easy: this is how the neocortex can break tasks and procedures into a larger phase space of smaller pieces. This is the Way or Path or Tao of Being Human: Easy-dose-it, take-it-easy, be-cool!
It also applies to Knowledge and wisdom: to know thru the simple. Simplify Simplify Simplify!
This is what I am hoping to do in writing these pages: make designing the mind Simple!
In science this simplifying is called “reductionism”. The other side of this is the next step of how things fit together: maps of maps! This is exactly what consciousness does! Holomind is holograms of holograms. This is not pictures of pictures, but phase spaces within phase spaces. Completeness is the keyword here: the little pieces must fit together to make a whole. We cannot keep breaking wholes into little pieces until all the pieces look alike, but lose their connection with the whole. That is what has happened within modern physics and quanta mechanics: the little pieces of atoms lose touch with mind and consciousness. We view this as mere matter instead of states of mind and consciousness that are incomplete maps.
Put pros and cons in different colors!
Categorization is the storage of code with a coherent source in a phase space. Consciousness is looking at Data-in thru the coherence of Self/World [self = Yang, world = Yin of a single wave structure]. Reading cards is reading the holo-code of coherent place stacks just like understanding which note in a melody belongs “where” in the key signature, where key is the coherent source as the underlying consciousness.
How do I graph and visualize and animate this?
So a deck of cards is like 4 coherent sources and the stacks in a solitaire game is the phase space of consciousness. In reading the cards each stack has a different life meaning and the cards that are next to each other have a meaning. In music the stacks would be like melody, rhythm, harmony, instrumental sound, and phrase and structure like march or symphony etc..
Had dream last night that sharing is Buddha or highest level of being human. Sharing seems more in line with Christian ways, but there are big questions about motivation. Helping is close to this? I don’t see sharing as a basis for religion: not built in. but sharing of results and “truth” is built into science. This sharing is without restrictions as in religion: unqualified by requiring those one shares with to believe the same or be assimilated!
New and improved: my representations are within the “materialist – industrialist” paradigm. It also is completeable with religion and other cultural positions! My work brings things together and make them “work” better: to improve and reveal the meaning!
The ability to improve and change and be creative is thwarted by “belief” and ignoring the facts when things fail!
New dimension of mind: the neocortex has opened mind space that allows unification of previous seemingly opposite [view] points of view between traditional religion and science.
Dyads [like Jupiter / Saturn] as family system described by Bradshaw. Thus doing things for the good of the system. This is strong in Qi meridian system of the organs. Then the higher systems tend to shape the lower systems where, for instance, anger repressed for being “good” ends up as accumulation in the liver. This shows how I project good / bad mother / father and end up being upset by the behavior of others.
From Bradshaw’s Creating love pg90
CREATING
AN IDENTITY OUT OF CONFUSION
In
order to understand the mystified false self, we have to go back to infancy. As
infants, we have no real experience of self separate from our mothering source.
Our self-image is based on our mother's mirroring face. The infant perceives the
world through the mother's eyes. The child's self is identical with the mother's
sense of the child's self. What happens when the mother fails to provide
affection and approval? Dr. James Masterson, an authority on defeaive
self-formation, writes:
The
child's intense . . . need for affection and approval from his mother to build
ego structure is so absolute and hi.s rage . . . at the deprivation of these
very supplies on the part of his mother so great, that he fears these feelings
may
destroy
her and himself. To deal with his fear, the infant splits the whole object of
his mother into two parts, that is, a good and bad mother.
The
infant does this through a primitive defense called "object split-
ting" (see the figure below). The "bad" mother is not the child's
mother. She is someone
else.
Therefore, the child can direct rage at the mother without deal- ing with the
fear of her leaving. A true sense of self begins to emerge during the
separation-
individuation
stage of development, which occurs during toddlerhood. At this age, children are
walking and enjoy the new sense of mastery
OBJECT
SPLITTING IN INFANCY
GOOD
BAD
MOTHER
MOTHER
that
locomotion brings. Just as they can now walk away from mother physically,
children develop an image of themselves as an object and come to perceive
themselves as separate from the mothering source. If all goes well, they also
learn that mother is one and the same person in all her moods and appearances.
Children
need to develop this single image of the mother—an image of the mother as both
satisfying (good) and frustrating (bad). Children need at the same time to
develop a whole image of them- selves. In other words, children need to be able
to see the mothering source as both/and and themselves as both/and--both
comfortable and uncomfortable, both good and bad. The technical term for this
ability is "object constancy."
Successful
separation and individuation gives the child the capacity to relate to others
and to themselves as whole persons. This ability is a crucial preparation for
later satisfying interpersonal relationships, both intimate and social. To see
others as whole persons, according to Masterson, means "to see them as both
good and bad, gratifying and frustrating, and to have this relationship persist
despite frustration at the hands of the object (the other person)." YVith
object constancy, the person I love is the same as the person I hate. And I am
the same person whether she approves or disapproves of me. It is a both/and
situation, not an either/or situation. If this development is interrupted--and
in shame-based families it almost always is--the child cannot individuate. The
child also fails
to
develop the capacity to relate to the mother as a whole person. If I am arrested
at the infantile state of object splitting, I see you as all good when you meet
my needs and as all bad when you fail to meet my needs. You are a good person or
a bad person--not one whole person. And I view myself with the same
polarization--as good or bad, all or nothing. Object constancy is a fundamental
achievement of successful separation and individuation. A child who separates
well can evoke a stable and consistent memory image of their mothering source
whether she is there or not. Out of sight is not out of mind. Mystified adults
are often unable to connect very deeply with anyone. Out of sight is out of
mind. I've seen clients who can leave one partner and latch onto another in the
blink of an eye. They can do this because, lacking object constancy, they have
no ability to evoke the image of their lost partner and hence no ability to
grieve. They are cold- hearted.
If
you cannot evoke an image of the person who leaves you and cannot mourn, you
cannot resolve the many issues of separation life presents us with. This amounts
to saying that you cannot grow up. The figures below and on page 94 may help you
get a picture of this very complex theorizing. And while it is a theory,
something very like this happens to many people who exhibit mystified love. They
create two images of their beloved--one is idealized and one is degraded. The
beloved is idealized when they measure up to the person's image of a good lover
(child, parent, partner, friend, etc.). The beloved is judged and degraded when
they do not measure up to the person's image. What is missing in such love is an
image that has both extremes synthesized. The synthesized image is human and
sets up realistic expectations. The polarized image is inhuman and sets up
unrealistic expectations. Failure to achieve separation and individuation and,
therefore, object constancy, has five disastrous consequences for both
self-image and other relationships.
OBJECT
CONSTANCY
IN
TODDLERHOOD
I
can be both The same mother can
good
and bad. be both good and bad.
Basis
of the Ability
to
Grasp Polarity
FAILURE
TO ACHIEVE
OBJECT
CONSTANCY
Good
Bad
Mother
Mother
When I get what I
When I don't get what
want or need, Good
I want or need, Bad
Mother is there. Mother is
there.
Good
Bad
Child
Child
When
Mom gives When Mom withholds
me
love, I am good. Iove, I am bad.
Basis
of Polarization
The
mystified person relates to others as parts rather than wholes, as objects
rather than subjects. This creates an either/or, all or nothing, type, of
thinking.
Mystified relationships cannot tolerate frustration and
fluctuate
widely
according to feelings and needs.
The
mystified person is unable to evoke a sustaining image of another person when
that other person is not present. There is apanicky sense that, when a person
goes away, they will not return.
The
mystified person has a split scene of self. Either good me or bad me. Either
more than human or less than human.
The
mystified person cannot mourn. Thus any object loss or separation is experienced
as a calamity and a substitute object is quickly found.
The
Split Self
The
figure on page 96 shows Stage Five of the mystification process. At the bottom
of the figure you can see a circle with a star. That circle is your true self;
the star it contains is your wonder child. The wonder child, like all natural
organisms, wants what he or she wants and has a natural urge for completion. The
mystification process be- gins so early that the connection with, and urgings
of, the true self become unconscious. Nevertheless, we all have moments when our
true self breaks through. I will call these "soulful" moments. These
breakthroughs
may come in our dreams, in our seemingly irrational behavior, in our rage, in
moments when we act uncharacteristically. When someone says, "That's not
like you!"--that may be a moment when your soul is breaking through. As you
can see from the diagram, the mystified person's self-
system
is composed of two extremes, with the person often going from one to the other.
A dominant pattern of adapting will be selected and owned--usually from the
"good side" polarity of the split self, but its opposite will also be
lurking in the background. One extreme is giving in to the sense of
worthlessness that's at the root of the confusion. The identity that the person
has in this extreme is a negative identity. It says, "l am worthless as I
am," "I am no good," "There is something wrong with
me," or "There is something wrong with my body, my perceptions, my
feelings, my needs, my desires, my thinking, my drives." A false
self-identity trance is developed out of this extreme. The false self might be a
fawning, servile people pleaser, whose core identity is "I'll do anything
to please you." Alternately, the core identity might be "I'm a victim,
see all the things that have happened to me, so please love me" or
"I'm so dumb, stupid, crazy, inept, ugly, fat, rotten, etc., I might as
well give in and be a failure, a
slob, the class dunce, etc." or "I'll rebel against everyone and
everything." These are strategies that give the person a definition, an
identity. "I'm the class failure" is an identity.
I
call such strategies the less-than-human strategies. These strategies have
undeniable payoffs. If I am less than human, no one can expect anything of me.
If I reproach and blame myself all the time, no one else will be able to
reproach or blame me. Being less than human, I can give up all discipline and
responsibility. Above all, I can never fail, because I am already a failure. At
the other extreme are the more-than-human strategies. The identities that flow
from this extreme involve power, control, perfectionism, judgment,
righteousness, and blame. If I am in power, no one can hurt me. If I am perfect,
no one can expose me. If I am in control, no one can catch me off guard. If I am
righteous and saintly, no one can criticize me, and I can criticize, judge, and
blame everyone. These are the "I'm OK, you're not OK" type of
identities.
Only
healthy shame would allow us to be human and whole. As humans we make mistakes,
suffer, need help, bumble along, and know that we are not God. The false self
created to deal with the confusion and disorientation of internalized shame
tries to be more than human and/or less than human. Most mystified people act
out both extremes. They have an all-or-nothing polarization in the center of
their personality. If I can't be all, I'll be nothing. If I can't be
extraordinary,
I'll be a worm. Wolinsky calls these two coexisting extremes "oppositional
trances. "To see how these oppositional trances develop, consider the
following examples. A young child is playing with her mother's makeup. She has
lipstick and powder all over her. Her father shames her for what she is doing.
The little girl's natural desire is to respond by saying: "I want to keep
doing this. I will do it." Her father scares her by threatening to spank
her. The threat thwarts her natural response and triggers confusion. She knows
what she wants and feels, but she cannot risk losing her father's love. So she
may choose to do "anything to please him." This is an effective
choice, especially if her father chronically controls and shames her. In such a
situation first one identity is tried and then another. The identity chosen is
the one that most successfully resolves the confusion. The first response the
child tried was her natural self choice. "I want it my way." This is
everyone's first choice. If that had worked, she would have continued to use it.
As the child was shamed, she developed a trance state that said, "I am
really bad for wanting it my way." The oppositional trance is "I'll do
anything to please you. I'll do it your way." The two identities, "I
am bad" and "I'll do anything to please you'" coexist, each
sitting at one extreme. Their
coexistence creates a state of tension and a power struggle within the person.
To resolve this tension, children quickly learn to project one identity and own
the other. My "I'll do anything to please you, I'll be perfect"
identity is the one I own. I project "I am bad, I want it my way" onto
others--often in scathing criticism. It's easy to spot projection in the child
who innocently protests that "bad Susie" (her imaginary friend) was
the one who spilled the milk. It's a lot harder to spot in ourselves. When we
project our "I am bad, I want it my own way" onto others, we pick up
the slightest hint of self-gratification or selfishness in them. We are often
relentlessly critical of those who seem to be doing exactly what they want to
do. I remember an unmarried woman I counseled who passionately scorned other
single women in her apartment complex for their alleged sexual promiscuity. My
client belonged to a very rigid fundamentalist religion. She was moralistic and
judgmental. Yet she often dreamed of being raped by dozens of men. She dressed
in a way that was modest but seductive. She wore long skirts and tight long-
sleeved blouses that emphasized the roundness of her breasts.
I
remember this well because I was concerned about my sexual feelings about her. I
thought that maybe they were coming from my own sexual issues, so I checked my
perceptions with the female psychiatrist who had referred her to me for
counseling. My psychiatrist colleague also found the woman seductive. This woman
projected her erotic and desiring "I want what I want" self onto other
sexy women and owned her "I'll do anything to please you" self in her
dutiful and moralistic religious behavior. Other people flip-flop between their
oppositional false selves. My "I want it my way (I am bad)" self came
out a lot in my spousal relationship, while I was most often in my "I'd do
anything to please you" self in public.
Family
System Enmeshment Roles
In
the preschool years from ages 3 to 6, a child's developmental task is to form a
first primitive identity. A new family role will be added to the basic sense of
self. When the family is very dysfunctional, the child's choice of roles is
severely narrowed. Remember that the roles are selected to meet the needs of the
system, rather than the individual. They maintain the system's balance at the
expense of the individual's uniqueness and spontaneity. The rigid roles are also
chosen because of the confusion created by the family's enmeshment. In the
dysfunctional family system, roles are often polarized. This isn't surprising,
since the dysfunctional family operates like a whole individual organism. One
child may be rigidly good (behaves according to family rules) and another
rigidly bad (rebel’s and breaks the rules). Each has the polarized opposite
role. The good child wants to be bad some of the time and vice versa. But the
systemic forces keep each one in their rigid role. The important thing to
understand, whatever role you chose, is that it gave you a sense of structure
and definition. With it, you felt like you had some control. The role defined
you, and you took on the boundaries or limits of that role. The role became a
particular trance you lived. Over time you believed that this limited boundary
was who you were. Wolinsky calls this a "thought form limitation."
Your
experience is narrowed by such a thought form or belief about yourself. All of
your feelings, thoughts, wishes, are limited by this chosen trance identity. I
also found that over the years my trance role functioned like an addiction. I
became so completely identified with the roles of Star and Caretaker, I had no
idea how to behave if I was not being the Star or Caretaker. These identities
greatly limited the possibilities of my experience and, therefore, my freedom.
The
Ultimate Mystification
These false identities give us the sense of being clear of the confusion.
The fact is that they really hide the confusion. In essence once the hypnotic
identity trance is formed, we no longer know we are confused. Instead of having
to face and resolve the dilemma--that "I'm most loved when I'm not being
me" or "I don't know who I am"--the false self creates the
ultimate level of mystification. At this level, I either don't know that I don't
know who I am or I think I know who I am, /out I really don't. Are you confused?
Two mystified selves trying to have a relationship and create love are asking
the impossible of themselves. In a mystified love relationship, we have two
people who are not really present, who think they know who they are and who
don't know that they don't know who they are. It's not a pretty picture! After
sitting through twenty-two years of counseling some eight hundred couples, I can
guarantee you that it's mystifying.
STAGE
SIX: THE INTERNALIZED FAMILY
The
mystified state is maintained through the internalized family system. The false
self keeps us bonded. The mystified person has never separated from the family
system. In order to grasp how this bonding works, take the following short quiz.
Simply answer each question yes or no.
1.
Do you get angry and/or defensive when your spouse or lover criticizes your
parents? Yes No
2.
Do you get angry and/or defensive when someone outside your family makes a
realistic but negative remark about one of your source figures? Yes No
3.
Do you still resent one or both of your source figures? Yes No
4.
Do you obsess on one or both of your source figures? Yes _ No _
5.
Have you stayed in a stuck relationship long after it was healthy to be there?
Yes No
6.
Have you stayed in a destructive relationship long after you understood that it
was self-destructive to be in it? Yes No
7.
Whenever you take the time to reflect on it, do you feel that you are not afraid
of death? Yes No
8.
Do you feel more comfortable talking about your faults than about your
strengths? Yes No _
9.
Do you complain about your parents and then quickly explain their motives in an
attempt to excuse their problems or weaknesses? Yes No
10.
Have you been told that you imitate the worst qualities of your parents? Yes No
_
If
you answered any of these questions yes, you may still be internally bonded to
your primary source figures. The more questions you answered yes, the greater
the attachment. The parental figures live on in us in the form of internalized
voices and governing scenes. The family system also lives on in the internalized
rules that we carry and in the rigid roles we first learned to play in the
family system. As we discussed in Chapter 1, myriads of people have re-created
their original family bondings in their current relationships--not only in their
friendships and spousal relationships, but also in their relationships with God,
self, and the world at large.
This
internalized maintenance of the family system operates as a trance. The trance
governs the person's choices like a pair of glasses with blinders on the side.
Within the self-to-self interpersonal trance the person hears the family
figures' voices, which operate as the beliefs governing most of what the person
thinks and chooses to do.
America sees war in the light of a fight for self organization: independence and revolution! Near eastern cultures may see things as revenge and dominance? Yet this also seems like asserting self organization, but also dominance over “holy places” that belong only to a select group. This is indirect dominance and supervision!
Christian forgiveness is aimed at forgiving and forgetting sorrow and one’s own pain. The other choice is to stuff and hide the suffering. It is not about “sin” but about parts of ourselves that wage war on other parts. So “war” is built into being self organizing and holominded! Of many parts!
The RISC technology maps the new human mind that can load maps into consciousness / mind as especially implemented in drama: there the characters / action and processes are loaded into the minds of the audience! This is the same process as naming anything: it loads a map into RISC consciousness. This as first mapped is how “personality” or selfhood is loaded and why the person has no knowledge of this process as the higher level of mind and process. The Buddhists called RISC Sunyatta or emptiness!
Humans have immense capacity and power that we give up for community: we draw lines and threads from our power and share ourselves and our capacity to enlarge and expand and develop that capacity. We select a few threads to call our life and share the ignored possibilities with others who select that thread for themselves, thus they share what we select with us. This sharing is the refusal and ignoring that they could also become what we are and fight / compete with us to be themselves and to be us at the same time! It is the giving up of complete power in order to share with others that makes us even more powerful!
Complementarity is really crest/trough yin/yang and left/right brain as complete holomind! Thus particles and waves are aspects of the same complete holomind but opposing concepts of critical/judgmental brow chakra! Here particles are the stable phase structures of holomind we call matter!
Suffering is part of evolution: the biological experimentation of self organizing systems by genetic algorithms. It is built into being biological and development. The first stages of any new development result in errors. When we refer to these errors as suffering and look for blame we bark up the wrong pile of shit! The tree of 3D logic is never wrong!
There is never Karma to blame, but looking for the causes of problems in the total structure is correct reading of Karma!
Why does “God” allow suffering to happen? Because suffering is a part of God’s nature as being self organizing in the present here and now! If God created the world and left, then there is no blame. But God creates now which results in many contradictory processes! Even viruses are part of creation and are evolving creatively. Random suffering allows the entire population to be examined and all problems examined! Contact the actor Mike J. Fox with Parkinson with these thoughts!
What is enlightenment? It is not a one time event, but a starting over from the root of mind that was called rebirth: yet it does not conceptualize itself but is the beginning of the development of the skill to restart with any activity of conceptualization. It is the transcendence of subject – object beyond the “self” as the map of culture necessary within the context of self organizing mind!
Religion is about construction mind that fits all society. Science looks for absolute truth for all minds. But this does not fit individual mind, yet it provides new skills and structures for constructing individual mind. The aim of knowing mind called self realization, can now be realized!
Have 2 parts to start page! How mind was constructed by culture and how to construct individual mind! Starting with the agricultural revolution a common “one mind” needed construction. From Buddhist and original “Jesus” a revolution was started to construct and know one’s own mind. This was a threat to emerging civilization as the forced unity of diverse cultures that spoke different languages under one common map. Thus the Roman and Holly Roman Empire and the empires of Islam and now the “American” civilization developed skills of requiring one common mind. With the scientific revolution that introduced individual “public domain” of opposition [where efforts were in the direction of disproving new innovations], No-mind became possible.
All belief and individual mind were seen as “opinion” and truth only existed as common shared skills that work or can be applied to all! This is the direct connection with “source coherence” and creativity opened up to every individual human without respect to their “history” or family - culture – race of origin!
The belief of “science” is that this method will reveal “truth” that applies to all situations and can be used by all persons! The next step is development of process and methods that can be applied according to individual differences. This allows the individual construction of holomind. Knowing that coherence is a requirement is the first step, and knowing one’s self and spirit mind is part of this construction!
Belief and concepts are examples of holomind coherence in phase spaces. Thus the yang is the organized content and the yin is the excluded, which opposition is very important in the full definition – recognition.
Is the “engram” really my ides of the internalized map that allows culture to emerge within self organizing n.nets?
Belief is not only resonance with mind, but also can become expanded to explain everything which results in incompetence [Peter principle] and authoritarian political systems [internalized maps].
Teaching – guru is for the teacher, not the student, and is now replaced with the public domain where the “guru” is required to put the “teaching” in a form that can resonate with all readers. Within this paradigm, contradictions are accepted and welcome so the “teaching” can evolve – develop. This view is supported by the holographic mind paradigm where mind operates from all viewpoints, not just one as in religion. This applies to science where it has taken on religious-like structures: where mind and belief can be ignored as “subjective”. Within “Calresco” [complex systems] “subjective” can be operated on [viewed] as part of self organization within neural networks.
At the time of the beginning of science, there were not enough math and other developments to support, in a scientific way, the prior developments in what is now viewed as religion and spiritual practices. For instance, the I Ching could not be seen as pointing to fractals, quantum states that unified mind and matter as well as a model for consciousness within the holographic paradigm of mind. The many views of peace, gentleness and the easy – simple had no direct root as a newly evolved structure of the human neocortex. We saw music only as art, not as a scientific map of holomind [holographic mind]. We did not see the ideas of “God” from many directions: as the basic coherence upon which the holomind code for all of “reality” is written and reMembered, as creativity built into all process as self organization, and as the source for “laws and rules” within the structure of any coherent source as being phase “angles” all lined up! The idea of omnipresence and omniscience seemed to have no connection with science, but now we are beginning to se relationship to non-locality and Bohm’s ideas of the implicate order.
We had no idea that in altered states of consciousness, which I view as quantum consciousness at different levels of resolution, the mind has access to levels of reality as “fine” as quarks! That we could have access to evolutionary older “animal” structures of mind, and the neocortex could load these “hardware” structures as “software” programs that is now done by the RISC technology of computer chips. Thus we could differentiate into a human cultural internalized ecological system where tasks could be distributed. We could not imagine that these “animal software programs” could directly track the cosmos as sources of coherence. Thus these programs would be written in holomind code!
This unavailability of connection between science and “subjective” emergences directly from holomind is now understood by the math of self reference: the highest levels of operation in self organizing systems cannot directly “know” their structure or self program their own operation while they are performing as executive decisions and operations. The self contained and self aware “programs” at lower levels of operation can make maps of the higher levels, but only as what came to be called belief and meaning, and only when supported indirectly with “emotional resonance” with the higher levels. These feelings of beauty and meaning could not even be seen as self aware resonance.
Thus science cannot easily see itself as the fulfillment of many of the goals of religion. The many views of holomind can generate the public domain and falsifiability as new developments in science and spiritual. Religion stills maintains a single viewpoint: all religions cannot be “right” at the same time. There is no complementarity in religion. This emerges from the need for stability in culture that can be internally accepted by all to develop in spite of the restrictions of self organizing neural nets to not be supervised as a group from sources external to the physical boundaries of the n.net.
So how do these new synergies change science? They introduce new directions for understanding the structure of holomind that emerged directly from mind. They introduce new tools for the exploration of reality, that are beyond the scope of present machines, as offered by such organizations as psychotronics and such “paranormal” uses of holomind as shown in the psychic viewing of quarks.
This is an expanded view of science as offering the realization of many of the goals of humanity expressed in religion and metaphysics.
The changes to religion may not be acceptable to those currently practicing religion: they involve accepting the premise that spiritual revelations are “translated” into language within the limitations of pre-scientific human cultures that have very different traditions, histories and goals. These limitations of language cannot be overcome by or with the use of any language. Thus even within science, it is necessary to accept complementary or opposite views and theories as equally true. There was a sound reason and reality in the use of the absolute “Word of God” as an absolute truth, but it is not for the understanding or knowing of Truth, but for the purpose of allowing stable civilization and culture to emerge within self organizing n.nets whose nature is to develop in all directions from the same information! The statement of Taoism that the “Tao that is spoken is not the real Tao” sums it up. Also the natural logic of n.nets is fuzzy logic and the natural logic that provides the most direct form of stability of religion and civil culture is rational
“good or evil” logic [of the fruit eaten by Adam!].
What new science has emerged from this synergy with spiritual revelations?
1. For the structure of holomind prefigured by astrology.
2. For understanding learning and skillfulness.
The goal is learning can be immediate and simple: off the top, immediate “gut” response. What happens when you hear – read this? It can come from and involve all points of view!
3. For
Skillfulness: the answer to evil. Organization of book? So religion can be seen as skillful response to needs of the time. Thus we develop culture to overlays of complex that become more inclusive and open. Then religion of discipline such as Yogas and Theo responses to the needs of agriculture add skills but are not stop – end – final - absolute points.
So progress and learning – improvement will not stop: God [however spirit is known or mapped] has not left creation and development!
Evil can be mapped as return to old, more stable, forms - operators and maps of development. Thus the connection with the personality – self as a single isolated entity with “animal” [horse – sheep/lamb brain] operators. The alternative is “love” as a connection to a broader, more inclusive open and complementary culture, which is admittedly more diffuse, fuzzier and less stable – bright – intense.
TV does produce maps of holomind: a new example is “Smallville” which tells a story about superman as an infant to teen who is discovering his power! This idea of a infant from another planet who does not have any adults of his species to instruct him or demonstrate his innate inner power exactly maps the evolution of humans over the last million years. We developed the neocortex and language and discipline for specific purposes: away from the forest we had to compete with humongus large animals and later develop agriculture. We were successful to an extent that made us totally different or alien from any other species, even our brothers the apes! So we don’t know what is the extent of this development, we have no teacher. So we invented “God” as teacher, but even that fell far short because it was about and “out there” exterior reality! Even when pioneers came like Jesus and Buddha to tell us that it is all within us, we made them into a different kind of “God”: “God in the flesh”, or “Only Son of God”. It is very clear if anyone reads the complete set of gospels as Thomas or Andrew that Jesus was talking about creativity within each of us. But then the 2nd “Christ”, namely Constantine, “put things straight” back to following others. Not as much was lost in Buddhism, but when I tell others that I am a Buddha, that their instructions found in Buddhist scriptures really work, I very quickly learn how much deterioration has taken place. Others take such a statement as a brag instead of listening to what new maps of skills already in them that I am pointing to. So why bother.
I can point to the expanded viewpoint of truth from all angles introduced by science and that everyone has a valid right to speak, which supports holomind, in US culture. All of this and much more is built into the biology of holomind and being human: we humans only need to utilize it in the many ways that are used in competitive productive industry to “make a better working product” or procedure - skill. Thus even sports or the performing arts is within this spiritual realm of learning who we are. Just try the concertos of Paganini or List!
Information as the basis of biology: incoherent is information. Putting in alignment is health. The alignment is the procedure or steps mapped by each phase angle [vector]. Thus the “chemical” signals are fuzzy transitions that point to the next state. They are fuzzy because they are not stable pieces of the coherence: Qi.
Writing a book is the process of reductionism: reduce diversity and completeness to a few basic ideas. Reductionism is the BH of science. It is to strip truth of all structure and communication: just as a BH strips all “matter” and atoms of all mind as electron shells! Thus zealot religion tries to strip all identity by coming into the presence of God – BH with only black clothes!
So this writing is expected to be a discarding process.
The paradigm of religion as psychic orbit around a [the]
black hole fits the paradigm of discipline! Humans needed to invent discipline
and “laws” in order to accomplish the tasks of agriculture. Humans needed to
discard or ignore the self organization of the hunter psyche in order to deal
with the all day heat of the sun while doing the tasks of agriculture. Humans
also had to create planning for a future without food in the winter by food
storage and strict rules that connected with natural plant life cycle
structures: plant, tend, harvest, store. No wonder the Hindu culture explained
the basis of intelligence as the ability to ignore. [incorrectly called
ignorance] So the “black hole” stripping away of all inessentials fits this
paradigm. The trouble on 9-11 and the blame on Talliban covers some of the best
fit of religion to
the black hole paradigm: maybe culture is an orbit around a black hole and the
"devil" or "hell" is to descent into [being inside] the BH.
So the closer orbits that discard more “freedom” fit “orthodox”,
fundamentalists, extremists and “right wing” like Talliban or anti abortion.
The 7th Day Adventists have this shorter orbit as part of their name!
Is prayer 5 times a day the shortest orbit? Obviously the 30 years of war in
Afghanistan helped strip away the connection with modern culture, which was not
providing freedom and diversity to the common many anyway.
New idea: that the nuclear structure as mapped by quantum structures responds to or generates mind and Qi extends to the ideas – maps of spirit and “God – Allah”. Thus various stars or black holes, especially the BH at the galactic center, may respond beyond space and light as hinted at in the holographic paradigm: that all knowledge or information – code is everywhere present. It is as if all space is connected by “wormholes” that “spiritual” quanta information can pass thru, but not light or “matter”! The code would be in the causative “time domain” and as generating gravity would “shape space” itself. The response would be always present, like a machine that responds to all persons who “push the buttons”. Thus the idea that spiritual world is giving and “Grace” and love: all one needs to do is ask or “wish” [in a spiritual format?]. Thus my nuclear “center” always present and “active” of each body cell is connected by holes in space to the holomind!
There is a relationship between the raw information in “space” and the compact information of the time domain: this time domain is like a program that operates as process on “space objects” including light. Or operates on information to create “objects and raw media data like sound or images? So is this related to quanta or to electro-magnetics?
Space separates the time domain and is thus the basis of ignorance: an object in space is not participating with holomind of other objects and can ignore them to become an individual viewpoint within holomind!
Self realization is the final step in application of science and complexity: how does this fit as with tobacco and peace.
Thus the conditions of my not seeking or previous knowledge of Buddhist enlightenment points to the fact that those conditions referred to as enlightenment are already built into human mind and biology. Thus seeking enlightenment by rules and discipline is counterproductive: the culture of rules and discipline hide self organizing Buddha mind, which science has established is the only type of neural networks that are natural within biological systems.
Also advocating: TCM supports general systems of 5 dimensions. They support the theory that an injury results in a disconnection of holomind at tissue level: this disorientation of tissue from surrounding tissue interrupts the coherence [Qi] and is felt as pain. Accupressure or magnets as well as needles can restore the flow and reconnect. Maybe magnets are best?
Who can handle bad news and rejection better, optimists or pessimists? Optimists because they feel they can find a solution or improve their skills and do not need help from outside because they are “sinful”! The pessimist does not believe they can do it. This resembles the beginning Holy Roman Empire Christian doctrine: all men need to be saved from their sinfulness! The original ideas of Jesus refer to the “I AM” as the way success and skill. Science started out exploring and welcoming “improvements” that disprove and replace old ideas!
So follow the rules and do not interject “creativity” and one is promised a reward in “heaven” after life. This attachment to “promise” is still working in religions. Their doctrine that the “world” is evil and not to expect success is the strongest pessimism possible!
Is this what Marx saw?
"The basis of religious criticism is: Man makes
religion, religion does not make man. Religion is the self-consciousness
and self-esteem of man who has either not yet found himself or has already lost
himself again. But man is no abstract being encamped outside the world.
Man is the world of man, the state, society. This state, this society,
produce religion, an inverted world-consciousness, because they are an inverted
world. Religion is the general theory of that world, its encyclopaedic
compendium, its logic in a popular form, its spiritualistic point d'honneur,
its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, its universal source
of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realisation of
the human essence because the human essence has no true reality. The
struggle against religion is therefore indirectly a fight against the world
of which religion is the spiritual aroma.
True “romantic” or love from the depths is a connection of both with the source, now described as coming from quantum bioholomind as the coherence “light” of the DNA as a prelude to new creation of the “Son” or child of God! This is a “mystical” revealed as the same experience of the DNA splitting into two halves before creating a new being!
“Back to the Future!”: if the past is changed then the future is different. So the past is my future: if I change past views or concepts or evaluations then I can change my present which is future to the past. So these ideas about time may be part of holomind!
So could it be Islam that introduced the next level of spirituality by new move to peace and being centered: zero that allowed science to emerge? Whatever the sequence, what we have now is a new full access and inclusive world. Within this reductionist science violates spirit by exclusion of levels of resolution that are fuzzy logic of holomind. This results in the inability to directly map consciousness and mind and a complete reality and the inability / rejection of preexisting maps of holomind contained in the Arts, especially music, as well as religion and metaphysics that point to the full extent and reach of consciousness. This reductionist science gives maps of reality that can be proved correct and taught as knowledge and treated as process to build “machines” that model parts of holomind, but it refuses to include “meaning” or other maps of how matter and mind are ONE! Thus when I explain maps of meaning I go beyond traditional academic science to the everyday world of complete holomind accessible to everyone.
Algebra: constant of proportionality has the same mapping characteristics as level of resolution in an information space.
Pairs as in the Cross and Star write a composite holomind of two directions within an individual: group as in family or community – cultural and for the individual action. Thus Jupiter would be individual action and Saturn the family community with real connections to the parents and other generations. Thus energy connections relate to all of this, not just to an individual “self”! Thus Neptune relates to civilization: all humans, and Uranus to an individual within a group? Venus relates to the 12 meridians? This is a new paradigm about being human. Thus the AA give my life to a higher power is connecting to this group mind within! The psychological “super-ego” then has some validity as first glimpse! The older view of single objects and selves is finally understood within a general system. The “subconscious” is thus related to Venus Mercury and Moon also as pairs!
So it is not man and God as separate or together, but simultaneity. Is that what Jung was going for? Is it part of his thinking with archetypes?